1. The key thing here is that critiques like Schoen’s are designed to get people to conflate those two questions. They are designed to make the prediction that mainstream Americans will be repulsed by Occupy Wall Street into a self fulfilling prophesy. The exploitation of these cultural tensions is also an old story, one perhaps best documented in Rick Perlstein’s Nixonland. By painting the movement as scary and radical, critics hope to bring about a cultural reaction against it by focusing attention on its radical aura, its radical-seeming optics and tactics, rather than on what it actually stands for. That’s the game here.
    — 

    Greg Sargent, “What Occupy Wall Street’s critics are really trying to accomplish”, 10/18/2011

    Or as I like to translate critics: “Occupy Wall Street will never grow as a movement until they convince people like me to stop criticizing them.” Many of the people who claim to not understand what OWS’ message is, or, worse, demand that OWS produce a message for them, are concern-trolling the movement. They don’t want to join and they’re not interested in learning more from the people who are actually involved, but they feel left out of the discussion so they feel compelled to say something.

     
    1. lunarobverse posted this